Pithy is for Sithies.
Oct. 3rd, 2008 07:11 amI don't have any commentary on the VP debate last night. I was instead out listening to Slayer, speaking at an AoG church, speeding, folding newsletters, eating dinner, kicking my fiancée's ass at pool, and having sex. It's an exciting, fun-filled life I lead.
I might watch it on the retreads, but for right now I'm enjoying other people's interpretations of it. And I'm just pleased Biden didn't catch a fatal case of Foot-in-Mouth disease.
For now, though, that meme:
In honor of Sarah Palin's having been stumped by Katie Couric when she asked the Vice Presidential candidate to name any Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. Wade, we have a meme. The Rules: post info about ONE Supreme Court decision, modern or historic, to your LJ. (Any decision, as long as it's not Roe v. Wade.) Pass on the educational fun!
Since Palin was actually asked to name a case she disagreed with, how about... oh, I dunno, Dred Scott (not really a person)? Bush v. Gore (nuff said)? Roth v. United States (obscene material is still not protected speech)? I had to look up the case name on the last one, but I remember looking that one up offline before there was a World Wide Web...
I might watch it on the retreads, but for right now I'm enjoying other people's interpretations of it. And I'm just pleased Biden didn't catch a fatal case of Foot-in-Mouth disease.
For now, though, that meme:
In honor of Sarah Palin's having been stumped by Katie Couric when she asked the Vice Presidential candidate to name any Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. Wade, we have a meme. The Rules: post info about ONE Supreme Court decision, modern or historic, to your LJ. (Any decision, as long as it's not Roe v. Wade.) Pass on the educational fun!
Since Palin was actually asked to name a case she disagreed with, how about... oh, I dunno, Dred Scott (not really a person)? Bush v. Gore (nuff said)? Roth v. United States (obscene material is still not protected speech)? I had to look up the case name on the last one, but I remember looking that one up offline before there was a World Wide Web...
fun-filled life
Date: 2008-10-03 01:17 pm (UTC)Re: fun-filled life
Date: 2008-10-03 04:24 pm (UTC)On the other hand, it wasn't Queen, so, that's good.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 01:59 pm (UTC)It was never overturned officially, but the 14th? amendment made it a null point of contention.
My constitutional memory sucks, though, I'm still debating 13th vs 14th amendment in my head.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 02:36 pm (UTC)Dred Scott was ruled not to be (and never could be) a citizen with rights under the Constitution, which was certainly not the high court's finest hour. And yes, the case was originally brought in Missouri. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 03:47 pm (UTC)That's what I get for commenting in the wee hours.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 02:51 pm (UTC)the baby slept thru the night for the UBER-WIN!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:22 pm (UTC)(it might have been my best run, though... 1 ball, 7 balls, then 3, then 2?)
Also, room reserved. I rule!
no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-03 05:19 pm (UTC)