Do I just have that look in my eye?
Jan. 23rd, 2008 09:36 amWalked into City Hall and my long-time coworker CS (who runs Ham Radios and used to be our IT guy) walked up to me and, without preamble, asked "Dave, what's the best Linux distribution out there right now?"
So we chatted for a bit on it. He's got a new laptop to play with, and I'm not clear yet on how the newer distros handle the specialized hardware there...
Also, because
featherynscale and I were talking about it this morning: Brisbane academic finds link between new-age spirituality and poor mental health. I suspect she's confused cause and effect here, however.
So we chatted for a bit on it. He's got a new laptop to play with, and I'm not clear yet on how the newer distros handle the specialized hardware there...
Also, because
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:06 pm (UTC)Dear cod! That's the worst piece of "science" reporting i've seen in kind of a while. meanwhile, I can't actually find Aird's article -- has she even published these findings? I would really love to know whether she is this confused, or just the Brisbane Times.
I'm also curious to note that the article identifies her as a "PhD candidate", but many blogs and news outlets seem to be referring to her as "Dr Aird" -- clearly not all that hip to the terminology.It's a weird inconsistency, but the UQ website calls her Dr Aird too, so I suspect she's finished.Also weird, but not as weird as it seemed at first: these findings came from interviews studying pregnancy. My first thought was that they were only talking to pregnant women, and that that sample oddity would have been worth mentioning. But it's actually the case that this is a longitudinal cohort study -- the interviews were with people born 21 years ago, whose mothers had been part of a pregnancy study. Which means that they've got lots of other data about these "kids" -- I wonder what else is in there...
Grrr... Argh!
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:35 pm (UTC)Amen, brother llama. I mean, science reporting tends to be bad, but wow. Copy-editing is dead.
brother llama
Date: 2008-01-23 08:53 pm (UTC)I normally go more for "His Excellency", that sort of thing ;)
Re: brother llama
Date: 2008-01-23 08:54 pm (UTC)(Lama Llama Ding Dong?)
Re: brother llama
Date: 2008-01-23 08:57 pm (UTC)The Lama
The one-l lama,
He's a priest.
The two-l llama,
He's a beast.
And I will bet
A silk pajama
There isn't any
Three-l lllama.*
-- Ogden Nash
Re: brother llama
Date: 2008-01-23 09:38 pm (UTC)Re: brother llama
Date: 2008-01-23 10:29 pm (UTC)Re: brother llama
Date: 2008-01-24 12:02 am (UTC)My friend Celia wrote a song for/about me after we met last year, called "LlamaMan". But then she wrote a bunch of other verses about animal-name people: Tiger Woods, the Beatles, etc. But they were all famous but me, so my verse became one about the Dalai Lama instead of the Ken Llama. She says that she's going to record my verse for me once she gets it into the studio though. I can't wait...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:53 pm (UTC)Which is possibly MORE terrifying, as an idea...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 06:01 pm (UTC)If the Australian system runs about the same as the UK system, she may only just have had defenses and degree day (Exeter's graduation was last weekend). So it's entirely possible that she can rightfully use Dr, and the webpages just haven't caught up yet.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 06:04 pm (UTC)Sorry, kids, but the 1950s does not equal "old."
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:05 pm (UTC)This seems to show a 2004 unpublished paper, "The health and well-being of Australian adolescents over time: The difficulties associated with assessing change from available mental health data"
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:10 pm (UTC)(I love the intarwebs.)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 06:00 pm (UTC)poor, sad web designers who don't keep the copyright statements up to date... that's what dynamic content was created for.
i have rosemary aird's dissertation
Date: 2008-01-25 07:15 pm (UTC)turns out that Aird *just* got her PhD in December, and the research mentioned in this article is from her dissertation. through the application of my fierce library-fu, i have obtained a copy in PDF form. i've not looked at it yet, but I'm willing to share it with anyone who wants to take a look.
ps: title
Date: 2008-01-25 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 04:55 pm (UTC)::edit:: WorldNetDaily, of all places, has a slightly longer article, which seems to show that she's supporting (privately, if not in the paper) a causality based on practice, not prior mental characteristics.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:08 pm (UTC)The Me Generation
Date: 2008-01-23 05:21 pm (UTC)[More]:
Wikipedia lists a bunch of generations and their various labels. They identify the Baby Boomers at the Me generation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation#External_links
Note in fairness: I wonder if the generational labels differ in Australia?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 06:01 pm (UTC)Do you mean subscribe? I'm not familiar with any sense of ascribe that would make this sentence work.
subscribe vs. ascribe
Date: 2008-01-23 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 07:18 pm (UTC)It's the hair. Long-haired communist F/OSS users :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 02:45 pm (UTC)Would it be possible for me to discuss the Bazaar webpage with you after the Imbolc team is done meeting at your house tonight? (Before will not work, because we're supposed to be starting at 6.30.)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:10 pm (UTC)